|
|
Interview with NeuroSoup
on Drug Policy and the MERP Model
This is an early
interview (October 2007) that I did with Krystle Cole, the Editor and
Webmaster for the website "NeuroSoup." NeuroSoup actually focuses more
on Entheogenic drugs such as LSD, Mescaline, Psilocybin etc.

Welcome to the International Movement
to destabilize the Global Elite by demanding that each adult, throughout
the planet, is able to grow all of the Marijuana that they wish (e.g.,
for smoking, flour, tinctures etc.) without any taxation, regulation or
other government interference.
Interview with NeuroSoup
Here is a Video Biography:
Bruce Cain's "Drug Policy Video Biography"
http://www.newagecitizen.com/Videos.htm
Here is a written biography:
Bruce Cain has been involved in Drug Reform since the 1980’s. He
published a nationally syndicated magazine on drug and socio-economic
issues, “New Age Patriot,” from 1989 through 1997. He has also been a
featured speaker at various drug reform venues including the Ann Arbor
Hash Bash and Rainbow Farm. In 1996 he ran for US Congress as a
Libertarian against long-time incumbent John Dingle. In 2000 he began
the website “New Age Citizen. His current projects include: (1) the “New
Agenda for America”; (2) the “MERP” model for Cannabis Re-Legalization
and (3) a write-in candidacy for the 2008 Presidency. Although he does
not consider himself a serious candidate, at the moment, he hopes that
his efforts will help promote the various planks that comprise the “New
Agenda for America.” You can visit his website at www.newagecitizen.com
to learn more.
Introductory
Letter to NeuroSoup:
Krystle:
I hope this isn’t' too long. It comes in at about 2400 words. All
constructive criticisms are welcome. Note that I purposely use Marijuana
and Cannabis interchangeably, in part because MERP includes the word
Marijuana. This little exercise has actually allowed me to get on paper
what has long crystallized for me in terms of elaborating on the MERP
model. For that I thank you for getting me up off my butt. I also
changed the order of the questions so the reader would understand what
MERP is about before seeing the word bandied about numerous times.
I'm also interested in your thoughts on MERP. I believe that when you
really start to think about its implications it is really revolutionary
in some ways. Specifically, I think it poses a major challenge to those
that support Globalization, Corporate entities and Lassie Fair
Capitalism. The structure of MERP suggests a society that is much more
like a Commonwealth than a Corporation. And I really think that might be
a good thing. Such a change in government may actually be required if
humankind is to survive much longer. When everyone has the capacity to
destroy the world these Darwinist models no longer have meaning to our
Sociobiology.
The major tenant of Sociobiology is that life’s primary purpose is to
promulgate itself through time. It makes one hope that somewhere within
all that "junk DNA" there is some mechanism to allow us to change course
towards a "meme" that is better suited for our collective survival. I
have long entertained the theory that our DNA either contains our
collective unconscious (back to the earliest of DNA-based life forms) or
it acts a conduit to access that collective unconscious: acting somewhat
like an antennae tuning in a radio station somewhere out there in deep
space: or possibly somewhere at the sub-atomic level.
Interview:
1) Do you believe
cannabis should be legalized for all adults in the United States? Why?
A resounding yes! Of course Cannabis should be Re-Legalized for all
adults. As for why, let’s start with the some of the stronger common
arguments:
(1) Cannabis is one of the safest therapeutic agents on the planet. It
is also one of mankind’s oldest medicinal plants despite being
politically placed into the most dangerous “Class 1” category.
(2) 70 years of prohibition have had little or no effect in stopping
use.
(3) It has many therapeutic and palliative properties for people
suffering from AIDS/HIV; Glaucoma; MS; etc.
(4) There are no recorded fatal overdoses from the use of Cannabis.
That alone should be sufficient.
But my personal arguments for Re-Legalizing go much deeper. I think it
was Judge Brandeis who once said the most important right, was the right
to be left alone. Consensual adult activities should not be the domain
of any law provided those acts do not violate the safety and liberties
of other citizens.
It’s like the Las Vegas commercials that spew this mantra that “what
happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.” What you do within the confines of
your own property, given the earlier provisos, is not the business of
the state: whether that be local law enforcement or federal drug
agencies. It is so important that we push back against each attempt to
chip away our liberties.
I will even go one better. I think that all consensual activities should
be made legal as a counter weight to all the liberties we have been
forced to relinquish in the wake of 911. That way if the state’s
intrusive powers uncover a bag of Marijuana, there will be nothing they
can do about it. We have to start thinking in terms of “creative
resistance.”
My utopian vision is to be sitting on my porch, sharing a joint with a
friend, and not having to worry about a police car driving by to ruin
our afternoon. And if a police car did drive by I would want to feel
comfortable sharing a few tokes with that officer. I want to see a world
where people can start feeling good about each other once again.
Before going to the next question let me say something about laws in
general. Pythagoras developed the scientific method in order to
objectively judge the results of any scientific inquiry. To this end he
developed theorems in order to provide a method, a structure, for
scientific inquiry. It is really this framework, for scientific inquiry,
that has propelled science forward ever since.
As we restructure our legal system I believe there are two important
theorems that should receive primary consideration: (1) The Golden Rule
and (2) The Golden Mean. The Golden Rule is straight forward: “Do unto
others as you would have done unto yourself.” The Golden Mean has a
number of meanings but basically insists on proportionality in all
things.
Applying this to our Cannabis laws requires asking 2 questions: (1)
would I feel comfortable accepting the current penalties that are being
applied to other Marijuana offenders and (2) Are the penalties
proportional to penalties for other drugs: are the penalties in
proportion to the danger they pose to society?
2) What steps do
we need to take, as a country, to decriminalize cannabis?
Ultimately I would fully implement the MERP model for “regulating”
Marijuana. But let me first describe the prerequisite change the needs
to take place prior to implementing MERP.
The Achilles heal to “Marijuana Prohibition” is the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970. We need to force our representatives to take
Cannabis completely off the schedule. Once that is done the federal
government will no longer have an excuse to meddle in the drug policies
of individual states. The raids on Medical Marijuana dispensaries would
immediately cease.
But, at a grass roots level, people have got to stop being so damn
complacent. Confront your representatives when they come to town.
Organize with local, state and national groups. Insist that the national
groups get behind the MERP model for Re-Legalization.
And what is MERP you ask? It is a short way of saying the “Marijuana
Re-Legalization Policy (MRP) Project.” But that is a big mouthful of
syllables. So I like to refer to this model as MERP in order to condense
the concept down to a single syllable.
The MERP Model can be succinctly described as follows
“The MERP model of Marijuana Re-Legalization would minimally allow
non-commercial cultivation of up to 100 plants, by adults above the age
of 18, without any form of government taxation, regulation of other
interference.”
The “moneyed” drug reform organizations (e.g., those supported by Soros,
Sperling and Lewis) contend that this is far too radical. But it really
is not significantly different than the way we allow US citizens to
produce beer and wine within there homes. Home beer and wine production
is neither taxed nor significantly regulated.
And many activists need to be weaned from this false notion that the
government should get to tax everything. If they don’t tax your tomatoes
or your beer, why should they be allowed to tax your Cannabis?
The MERP Model does not preclude commercial licensing. But it forbids
the government from interfering with personal cultivation as specified
above. In doing this we have, in effect, a mechanism to check government
greed. At about $100 per ounce a lot of people would not bother growing
their own. But if the government charged $400 per ounce most people
would be turning on the grow lamps.
I really think this is one of the best ideas I have ever come up with.
It is so elegant in its simplicity. And it is also part of the “New
Agenda for America.” Benjamin Franklin selflessly gave the world
“lightening rods” and refused to profit by imposing a copyright on the
invention. Had it not been for the lightening rod, large building
structures, such as “skyscrapers,” would have been impossible. This is
due to the associated hazard of fires from lightening strikes. I would
like to give the world the MERP model with very similar intentions.
One thing MERP would also do is act as a Gatekeeper Drug: keeping more
and more people away from dealers that also sell hard drugs. I am quite
sure it would destroy the revenue streams for local drug dealers and
terrorist organizations alike.
Here are a few additional links for a broader discussion of MERP and the
reasons we really need to end Marijuana Prohibition:
=============================
Drug Policy
The MERP Project
The Marijuana Re-Legalization Policy (MRP) Project
http://www.newagecitizen.com/ReLegalization01.htm
http://www.newagecitizen.com/editorial_on_the_marijuana_re.htm
Why Lou Dobbs Should Support Marijuana Legalization
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VKf5YfQb7s&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Enewagecitizen%2Ecom%2F
How Continuing the Drug War could make Nuclear Terrorism a Reality
by Bruce W. Cain
http://www.newagecitizen.com/Editorials/v8n1NuclearTerrorism.htm
===============================
3) How much of an
effect would legalizing cannabis have on narco-terrorism?
Under the MERP model it would be quite significant. Virtually all
profits in Marijuana sales – by terrorist organization and drug gangs
alike – would instantly evaporate the very day the MERP is implemented.
It should first be understood that over 50% of terrorist revenue comes
from the sale of illicit drugs. Currently, Cannabis probably only
accounts for 20% of the global illicit drug market. But in a 500 Billion
annual global illicit drug market that is still significant. We could
probably rob the Mexican drug cartels of 20 billion a year just by
Re-Legalizing. And if nothing else it would keep the money in the US
economy creating more jobs for US workers.
But I think the effect would create a unique form of synergy. As people
have more access to cheap, high quality Cannabis – as under the MERP
model -- they would be less likely to encounter drug dealers that sell
harder drugs such as cocaine, crack, methamphetamine etc. But while it
may be hard to quantify I’m quite sure the net effect would, in any
case, be positive.
Another synergistic effect might be that people become more comfortable
with non-alcoholic drugs and it could pave the way for Re-Legalization
of other soft plant-based entheogens such as peyote, and psilocybin.
Legal psilocybin in Amsterdam has not resulted in any significant social
problems. Entheogens may also have been purposely prohibited because
they have a tendency to deprogram people from state propaganda: ever the
more reason to make them available to responsible adults.
Of course the MERP model would have a much more pronounced effect than
current strategies (e.g., Medical Marijuana initiatives) for 2 important
reasons: (1) It completely takes the profit out of the Marijuana market
and (2) it constitutes a permanent and structural change at the very
core of our legal system.
4) How would the
federal prison population be affected by the legalization of cannabis?
Well, the most significant effect of legalization, under the MERP Model,
would be 840,000 fewer arrests a year. And that IS very significant.
There would be some reduction in federal prisons but most drug
convictions end up with some form of probation. We are now up to
arresting 840,000 Cannabis users annually. Over 80% of these arrests
involve simple possession. I actually think the lions share of these
never go to prison and most that do end up in state facilities. The
problem is that once you get “tagged” by the criminal justice system it
takes years to get out from under that shadow. They force you into “drug
classes” and urine tests and all sorts of totally unnecessary bullshit.
It reminds me of the Inquisitions where some citizens were forced to say
they were witches, when in fact they were not.
And of course they also rob you blind through the entire process. I have
been fortunate to have avoided this personally, but I am aware of the
disproportionate penalties and costs that go along with a simple arrest
for transporting Cannabis. And once your record is blemished they will
be on you like flies on shit, for the rest of your life.
I realize I’ve gone off on a tangent here. But there should be no
greater penalty for transporting Cannabis than for transporting a case
of beer from your local party store. And like I said: once Cannabis is
Re-Legalized all of this could go away forever. Of course it isn’t great
news if you are an attorney, a judge, or a city that will do anything to
raise revenue. Re-Legalization is probably not exactly great for a
Medical Marijuana “gardeners” who are often making between $25 to $35 an
hour either.
And actually the Medical Marijuana dispensaries have created a rather
ironic situation. The irony is that medical users are still basically
paying street prices for the medicine: about $12 to $18 per gram. For
patients like Angel Raich, who requires 7 grams per day – a quarter
ounce – such prices would cost her over $35,000 per year. Since many
medical marijuana users are both unemployed and sick, it is difficult
for me to imagine how they could even afford the medicine at these
prices. Re-Legalization would allow either patient, or caregiver, to
cooperate in the cultivation. Best of all this Cannabis would only cost
about $20, pre ounce, to grow under lamps and would be virtually free if
it were grown outside.
The current Marijuana laws really make you ask an important question:
“What kind of society goes so far out of its way to criminalize its
members, when what they have done should not even be a crime in the
first place?”
I don’t have the space to entertain that question here. But Naomi Klein
does a good job of it in her current book, “Shock Doctrine.” I
definitely recommend reading this book or at least “Googling” for more
information on “Shock Doctrine.”
5) Are you thinking of running in the 2008 presidential election as a
write in candidate? Why?
I am only doing this to promote the “New Agenda for America.” I have no
illusion about moving into the Whitehouse in 2009. Instead what I want
to do, through this "faux candidacy," is motivate people to ask the
Democratic and Republican candidates which planks of the “New Agenda for
America” they would support. The MERP model for Marijuana
Re-Legalization is currently the 3rd plank of the agenda. Here are all
of the major planks:
===================
NEW AGENDA FOR AMERICA: Preliminary Planks
Help Influence the 2008 Presidency
[More info: http://www.newagecitizen.com and click on topic]
(1) Universal Health Care for All American Citizens
(2) A 20-year moratorium on all immigration into the United States
(3) Legal Marijuana for all Adults and Medical Patients
(4) An immediate reversal to the Offshoring and Inshoring of American
Jobs
(5) A strict enforcement on issues of Separation of Church and State
(6) An immediate move from so-called Free Trade Agreements to Bilateral
Trade agreements
(7) A major R&D project to bring energy independence to the United
States and the World through recycling, reuse, ending hyper-consumerism
and investing in the development of sustainable energy sources (e.g.,
solar, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal)
(8) No further ownership of US Assets (businesses, homes, ports, stock
exchanges) by foreign governments or individuals!
(9) Replace the Federal Reserve with a People's Reserve which allows
public oversight
======================
I could be wrong but these are all things that I believe American
citizens want today. They are also required in order to stop the
colonization of the United States by foreign elites: a trend that has
been accelerating in recent decades. But do you think any of the
corporate donors, funding both parties, would allow any of the current
candidates to endorse ANY of these policy planks? Unfortunately, I think
the answer is a resounding “No Way.” Ron Paul might endorse some of
them; however, I am skeptical of his libertarian religiosity. I ran
against John Dingle for US Congress in 1996 as a libertarian, so I do
know what I am talking about here. Having said that I still think he is
the best candidate out there right now.
I am promoting the “New Agenda for America” (NAA), because I think the
current economic model is soon going to cause this society to crash and
burn. I fear that there could be a world depression or possibly a world
war in the coming decade. I believe the NAA could stave off the “buy
off” of the United States of America by foreign elites and offer
American citizens a softer landing as this current “business cycle”
crashes, like a lead zeppelin, in the next few years. I’m afraid we may
be on the cusp of a Second American Revolution and I would prefer that
it be a peaceful revolution if at all possible.
But what would be the first thing I would do if I became President of
the United States? At my inauguration I would tell the American people
that Marijuana Prohibition is over. Until the MERP model is fully
implemented by Congress I would set up a department to solely issue
pardons for every non-violent Cannabis arrest. Too bad that just isn’t
going to happen, isn’t it?
Finally, let me say that I do intend to go a little further than
treating my candidacy as a joke. I will be setting up a signup at my
website for people that might be interested in voting for me:
www.newagecitizen
And for those that would like to watch excerpts from my television
appearances and political speeches you can look through my “Video
Biography” at the following link:
Bruce Cain's "Drug Policy Video Biography"
http://www.newagecitizen.com/Videos.htm
In a three-way runoff (e.g., Clinton, Giuliani, Cain) it would take
about 40 million votes to win. Just before the election I would send an
email out to each person alerting them to how many have signed up to
vote for me. Then they can make their own informed decision as to which
direction we want to take the once-great republic. We need to keep in
mind that the average longevity for a nation-state is about 250 years. I
don’t know about you but, as we have just past the 200 year anniversary
for this republic, I’m thinking that I’d like to beat those odds by at
least a few hundred years.
Author, Bruce W. Cain

|
|
|
Back to MERP
Headquarters
Please send the link to
activists throughout the planet. The translation bar should allow
this to be read in any language. The 5-Point Strategy for
Marijuana Re-Legalization should be easy to implement in any country
throughout the planet. I encourage all groups celebrating the
Global Marijuana March to make the immediate implementation of the MERP
Model a primary focus of the event.
NAC Homepage Archive |
|
March 03, 2009
January 23, 2009
December 20, 2008
November 24, 2008
October, 04, 2008
September 23, 2008
September 09, 2008
August 26, 2008
August 03, 2008
July 13, 2008
June 27, 2008
June09, 2008
May 21, 2008
April 18, 2008
March 26, 2008
March 01, 2008
February 03, 2008
January 08, 2008
December 18, 2007
November 13, 2007
October 20, 2007
October 06, 2007
September 17, 2007
September 01, 2007
July 20, 2007
June 12, 2007
April 23, 2007
January 20, 2007
December 16, 2006
August 25, 2006
July 06, 2006
June 22, 2006
May 17, 2006
February 22, 2006
August 15, 2005
March 03, 2005
December 15, 2004
September 27, 2004
April 10, 2004
October 30, 2003
September 22, 2003
July 04, 2003
March 11, 2003
February 07, 2003
February 05, 2003
November 21, 2002
October 02, 2002

|
|


Call President Obama and your Representatives and demand:
(1) Immediate clemency for Marc Emery and
(2) Immediate implementation of the MERP Model through an Emergency
Session of Congress, similar to what was used to pass the TARP Bailout
on October 3rd, 2008
President:
U.S. Senate switchboard:
202-224-3121
U.S. House switchboard:
(202) 225-3121
The President:
Comments: 202-456-1111.
Switchboard: 202-456-1414







Share
your views on whether Lou Dobbs should support Marijuana Re-Legalization at our
new discussion group
 Click to join newagecitizen

NEW
AGE
EMPORIUM
Anything purchased,
through the links in this column, generate revenue for New Age Citizen
and will help us achieve the policy goals discussed at this website.
In addition to the book links is the "New Age Emporium" link below.
This will take you to our comprehensive digital storefront where you can
purchase anything from books, to DVD's, to computers. This allows
you to purchase things you actually need, while helping New Age Citizen
achieve needed social change. We appreciate your support.
|
Audio Test
|