Of course this website is in bad need of a re-write. But in an
interim attempt to tidy things up I have eliminated much of the
redundant information that used to recur on every homepage.
For the rest of 2008 I will be focusing on the
following projects:
* The "New Agenda for America"
* More videos and lectures promoting the "New Agenda for America"
* My Music Project "Gnostic" (coming soon)
* The "Dearbornistan" Project
I encourage new visitors to: (1)
Check out the "New Agenda for America", "Action Center", and "Resource
Center" links to better understand the primary project for 2008 -- the
"New Agenda for America and (2) go back through the
homepage archives in order to get a better idea as to the focus and
trajectory of the website. The "Video Archive" contains hundreds
of videos relating to topics within the "New Agenda for America."
These "departments" are now located at the upper
right column of the homepage:
I've featured some of my
acoustic music
from time to time but have yet to put forth any of my other
compositions. Soon I will be releasing a "Raw" version of the
"Gnostic" music project that
will feature about half of the compositions that will appear on the
final CD. You might say it is something
like the Beatles "Anthology" project in reverse (minus the talent) . . .
as they released early versions of their compositions after selling
their CD rights to Michael Jackson. I, on the other hand, am
releasing the early version first, because the final versions simply
aren't completed.
"Gnostic" is philosophically parallel to the
"New Agenda for America" in many ways. There is the "Hemp
Song" which strongly advocates for the legalization of
Marijuana. "I Know What You Want George" is a rocker
which criticizes George Bush's fascist tendencies. "Rainbow
Farm" is an instrumental homage to the massacre at that
occurred at "Rainbow Farm" the week before 911. If I ever
get out lecturing this year I may make an attempt to perform some
acoustic versions of some of the songs. At any rate I hope to have
the preliminary CD, "Gnostic: Raw," available within by the end of
March.
Well that ends my housekeeping notes.
Hope you appreciate the reduction in the clutter.
First let's take a look at a map of Europe and
the Middle-East from a perspective that the Corporate Controlled Media
would rather you not consider:
The green arrow points to Kosovo which has just declared its
independence from Serbia. For the moment the only thing I want you
to notice is that everything to the East of Kosovo is now controlled, or
on its way to being controlled, by Islamic Fundamentalists.
The next thing I want you consider is that 90% of the population of
Kosovo is composed by what the Corporate Controlled Media likes to refer
to as "ethnic Albanians." In truth they are Muslims and I'm quite
sure that this obfuscation is being perpetrated on purpose. What
they don't want us to "get" is the fact that Bush, Clinton, Obama, the
UN and the US Congress are supporting the creation of a Muslim theocracy
right on the doorstep of Western Europe. Why would anyone support
such an action in the wake of 911?
My Unintended Awakening
The following story outlines how I became increasingly suspect about
what was going on in Kosovo.
Around December 2007 I began occasionally going to a local restaurant
for my daily dose of coffee, nicotine and political discourse with a
number of like-minded "counter creatures." The owner looked
European and had volunteered that he was an immigrant from Albania.
I often wondered about the thuggish foreigners that would occasionally
talk with him, but never really gave it much thought.
Then one day he was sitting next to me at the counter and ordered the
Romanian waitress not to allow me a refill on my coffee: something that
had never occurred before. I told him that would amount to
discrimination and that I would call ICE if he persisted. He
backed down, however, I knew something was pissing him off . . . and it
wasn't the coffee refill. I later ran into one of the "coffee
creatures" at a local Target store and asked him if he had run into
similar problems. He had not and was surprised at the reaction of
the owner.
A few weeks later someone had sent me a video of a Christian Church
being burned down in Kosovo by "ethnic Albanians." Of course the
"ethnic Albanians were, in fact Muslims. Please check out the
video for yourself:
That is when I understood why the restaurant owner, from
Kosovo, was giving me such a hard time. You see, all of these
Muslims that were burning down the Christian Church all looked to be
Western Europeans. And most likely, the owner was a Muslim
Albanian. He is probably Muslim and was probably offended by one
of my favorite topics: the Islamoification of SE Michigan (especially
Dearborn and Dearborn Heights) by Muslims. Of course I have
nothing against Muslims that are only interested in practicing their own
religion. But I have always felt that those Muslims that support a
global caliphate should be repatriated back to their countries of
origin, since such a belief runs counter to the oath of citizenship that
all immigrants must pledge. I'm quite sure that is what actually
pissed him off.
Next I read the text accompanying the YouTube video. In it a
former UN commander revealed what was really going on in Kosovo:
"The objective of the Albanians is to purge all non-Albanians, including
the international community's representatives, from Kosovo and
ultimately link up with mother Albania thereby achieving the goal of
"Greater Albania." The campaign started with their attacks on Serbian
security forces in the early 1990s and they were successful in turning
Milosevic's heavy-handed response into worldwide sympathy for their
cause. There was no genocide as claimed by the West -- the 100,000
allegedly buried in mass graves turned out to be around 2,000, of all
ethnic origins, including those killed in combat during the war itself.
The Kosovo-Albanians have played us like a Stradivarius. We have
subsidized and indirectly supported their violent campaign for an
ethnically pure and independent Kosovo. We have never blamed them for
being the perpetrators of the violence in the early '90s and we continue
to portray them as the designated victim today in spite of evidence to
the contrary. When they achieve independence with the help of our tax
dollars combined with those of bin Laden and al-Qaeda, just consider the
message of encouragement this sends to other terrorist-supported
independence movements around the world.
Funny how we just keep digging the hole deeper!"
- Maj-Gen. Lewis Mackenzie, now retired, commanded UN troops during the
Bosnian civil war of 1992.
I was astounded. It was at this moment that I began to question
Clinton's 1989 bombing of Serbia and the supposed ethnic cleansing by Milosevic, who later died in
prison before his trial was completed.
Next I started to consider what this meant for South Eastern Michigan
which already has the largest Mid Eastern (ME) population in the United
States. The other day I had read about a half dozen black Muslim
mosques operating in the area: mostly run by Nigerian immigrants.
And now I'm left considering how many additional "invisible" Albanian
Muslims might be living amongst us. Could we already be a minority
within an invisible Muslim majority in SE Michigan?
If nothing else it seems to strengthen the rational for the 2nd plank of
the "New Agenda for America:"
(2) A 20-year moratorium on all immigration into the United States
For more information on the New Agenda for America goto the following
link:
Up until my "awakening" I never had a
clue as to what was really going on in Kosovo. But it is now clear
how this had occurred to regular reader of world news: the media
purposely lied to us.
If you look at the articles on
Kosovo, prior to the February independence you will never see the
mention of the term "Muslim" or "Muslim Fundamentalist." No,
instead you will always see them referred to as "ethnic Albanians."
Here is an example:
"Although Kosovo remains a province
of Serbia, it has been under U.N. and NATO administration since a 78-day
NATO-led air war halted a Serb crackdown on ethnic Albanian separatists
in 1999."
Kosovo Head Assures Rice on Independence
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jul23/0,4670,USKosovo,00.html
Watching the Christian Church burn, at the hand of European Muslims,
made me want to look into this further. So first I "googled"
for more videos on Kosovo. Here are a few that I viewed:
UN Complicity In Islamic Jihad Against Serbs The video you are watching shows footage of Arab Muslim Mujahideen (Odred
El Mudzahidin) being brought into Bosnia on UN transports to carry out
part of the Islamic war against the non-believers, in this case the
Serbs.
Formed under the orders of the Bosnian Presdient Alija Izetbegović, the
Mudzahidin, also know as the '7th Muslim brigade' were a unit made up
entirely of Muslim Arabs shipped over from the Islamic world to engage
in the wider Jihad and to help establish Muslim states within Europe.
Kosovo - Emerging as a Bastion for Radical Islam
Ripple effect warning of Kosovo independence. February 2008
Next I started doing some reading and was absolutely perplexed by what I
discovered:
* The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) is being financed by Saudi Arabia and
aided by the US and Nato. Yet they are largely populated by Muslim
extremists who are importing heroin from Afghanistan, for distribution
throughout Europe. The KLA is also arming Muslim extremists to the
teeth and distributing plastic explosives. And they also want to
turn Europe into a Muslim caliphate.
* Over 200 Christian Churches have been destroyed by Muslim "ethnic
Albanians" in Kosovo over the last 6 years. Meanwhile Saudi Arabia
has financed the building of over 200 Mosques in Kosovo.
* Over 250,000 Christians have left Kosovo, over the last 10 years, due
to Muslim violence on the part of "ethnic Albanians."
* The reports on the atrocities of Milosevic now appear to be largely
overstated and ignore the much greater Muslim-led violence that has
occurred since the early 1990's.
* Many Muslims see Kosovo "liberation" as the next phase in bringing
Islam to Western Europe.
In view of this one must wonder why Hillary Clinton, Obama, McCain,
Bush, the European Union . . . and many others, applauded the
independence of Kosovo. Here is a recent article which quotes
Hillary Clinton on the topic of Kosovo's independence:
A few days before the attack on the US embassy in Belgrade, Clinton
released a Molotov cocktail statement praising the declaration of
independence. In it, she referred to Kosovo by the Albanian "Kosova" and
said independence "will allow the people of Kosova to finally live in
their own democratic state. It will allow Kosova and Serbia to finally
put a difficult chapter in their history behind them and to move
forward." She added, "I want to underscore the need to avoid any
violence or provocations in the days and weeks ahead." As seasoned
observers of Serbian politics know, there were few things the US could
have done to add fuel to the rage in Serbia over the declaration of
independence - "provocations" if you will - than to have a political
leader named Clinton issue a statement praising independence and using
the Albanian name for Kosovo.
My own theory is shared by Professor Michel Chossudovsky, of Global
Research.
"Portrayed in stylized fashion by the Western media, Osama bin Laden,
supported by his various henchmen, constitutes America’s post-Cold war
bogeyman, who "threatens Western democracy". The alleged threat of
"Islamic terrorists", permeates the entire US national security
doctrine. Its purpose
is to justify wars of aggression in the Middle East, while establishing
within America, the contours of the Homeland Security State."
This article (above) should be mandatory reading for every American
citizen. Not only does it shed a light on what is going on in
Kosovo. It also illustrates, in glaring detail, how the
administrations of Carter through Bush (2) have actually funded Bin
Laden, the Taliban, Al Qaeda and many other Islamist Fundamentalist
groups over the last 30 years. We have actually built the very
monster that we must now defeat. Is it possible that they thought
they were building "Milton the Toy Monster" and are now finding
themselves facing a Muslim Frankenstein? Did they just merely
miscalculate? Or is this going to be the excuse to annihilate the
Middle East through Nuclear War in order to secure the remaining
repositories of the worlds oil?
For the moment, we can only guess. But it raises so many
questions:
* Why did Bush allow the Bin Laden family to fly out of the United
States after 911 without any questioning? And consider that no
other planes were allowed to fly during the time that they were escorted
out of this country.
* Why has Bush never successfully apprehended the alleged mastermind of
"911" -- Osama bin Laden?
* Why does Bush have no problems with China and Saudi Arabia buying up
our hard assets through Sovereign Wealth funds?
* Did the Bush Administration allow "911" to happen in order to create
an excuse for going into Iraq?
* Why is Bush so "cozy" with Saudi Arabia when it is so clear that they
are exporting Islamic extremism throughout the planet: including US
mosques?
In any case, the support for Kosovo's Muslim Independence -- by so many
of our countries elite -- only adds to the great mystery.
Hopefully this short article will compel Americans to begin questioning
the rational for this idiotic decision. In the meantime I
encourage you to read through some of these additional articles on
Kosovo:
I
just read an article that says between 270,000 and 400,000 unauthorized
Indian tech workers in the United States. In most cases they have
simply overstayed their Visas and no one -- especially our businesses
and our government -- seem to give a damn. Now this might not be
so maddening in a buoyant economy, however, we happen to be headed
towards a depression. And on top of it, we are running out of
water and other resources to boot. So how is it that our
businesses and our government continue to push for more immigration?
Here is a short excerpt from the
article:
The U.S. Department of Homeland
Security estimates that there are 270,000 unauthorized Indian natives in
the United States - a 125 percent jump since 2000, the largest
percentage increase of any nation with more than 100,000 illegal
immigrants in the United States.
The number of undocumented Indians is dwarfed by the estimated 6.6
million illegal residents from Mexico, according to the estimates from
homeland security's Office of Immigration Statistics. Yet, considering
the high level of education of many Indians, immigration experts say the
federal report hints at a new phenomenon: a high-skilled undocumented
workforce to go along with the nation's sizable numbers of low-skilled
illegal workers.
If trends continue, within three years India would trail only Mexico, El
Salvador and Guatemala as a source of illegal immigration. Another
national immigration expert, Jeffrey S. Passel of the Pew Hispanic
Center, estimates.
I guess it would be stupid to ask
"why" the U.S. Department of Homeland Security knows the numbers but
does nothing about it. Perhaps we should start issuing a bounty
for each one apprehended? Or I suppose we could simply start
shooting them on sight? Of course I'm kidding, but I'm sure there
are many Americans that are just about ready to do just that. Just
survey a group of American workers that were forced to train their
Indian replacements before they were fired. Then simply ask them
what they would like to do to the next Indian programmer they see.
I have a feeling your jaw will drop when they're done telling you what
they'd like to do to these foriegners.
Unfortunately every likely 2008
Presidential candidate is sure to open the floodgates to more Indian
programmers as soon as they get into the Whitehouse. This is
covered in the last edition under the title ""Write-In"
Candidate Bruce Cain discusses "Tech Issues." As you
can see from the chart (below) even Ron Paul would increase the number
of H1-B's and other visas for foreign workers. And despite
promising to stop any further immigration into the United States, not a
single tech or immigration group has bothered to support my presidency
or the "New Agenda for
America."
Now, I'm as convinced, as anyone,
that I have no real chance at the presidency. But if these groups
would just go along with the joke, we might at least force the
Presidential candidates to address the issue of legal/illegal
immigration. And we still have 8 months to get this thing going
"viral" over the internet. And, as far as I know, there is no
other candidate that would put a stop to the H1-B visa program in this
country. What are people waiting for? All you have to do is
paste a *.jpg file on your website and attach the following link to it:
This should be a no-brainer for the
many tech workers who have either lost their jobs, to Indian workers, or
may loose their jobs in the very near future.
One of the "funny" things about the
replacement of American tech workers with Indians is that it is only
well after the damage is inflicted, that we actually learn what our
government and businesses are up to. Let me give you a few
examples:
* It was only in 2007 that we learned
that law firms were holding seminars to teach US businesses how they
could NOT hire American workers.
* It was only in 2007 that it became crystal clear that the main reason
American businesses were hiring Indian programmers was because they were
paying them 25 to 33 percent less than their American counterparts.
So let me share some even "funnier"
information on how you are getting fleeced by your government and
American businesses:
Even if the salaries paid were
identical, there is a tax and healthcare savings. Many countries have
reciprocal agreements with the U.S. so that, as long as a worker pays
taxes in his or her country of residence, United States taxes are
waived. Health care is not an issue because of transfer coverage from
home countries. The omission of this growing segment of the workforce
from the Social Security System cannot help but contribute to any future
insolvency. Though these workers will not collect, they will not
contribute to the current retirees either, thus weakening the system.
The L-1 transfer Visa is seeing even more flagrant abuses. Engineers and
IT professionals are hired in their home country at their home rate, and
then brought here as the local office undercuts bidders who are using
American labor. These L-1 consultants are paid even less than the H1-B
workers receiving 33% under market are.
The Dilemma of the H1-B[page 17]
http://www.chicagolandeweek.org/IEJ-2008.pdf
Not only do US employers get away
with paying them 33% less and treating them like indentured servants.
On top of that they don't have to pay the 6.5% half of their Social
Security. On top of that they don't have to pay for a health care
policy that could cost as much as $10,000/year these days. Next
thing we're going to hear is that they are saving the CEO's more money
by acting as a surrogate for toilet paper. "Yes, you can lick my
butt hole now. Thanks!"
The politicians and business leaders
that have promulgated these policy needs to be hung publicly as
traitors. Don't you think it is time we said "enough
futhermucker?"
But I'm not done yet. Former
Federal Reserve Chief, Allen Greenspan, also endorses opening up the
floodgates to foreign tech workers:
Alan Greenspan wants to open the
immigration flood gates in order to allow
more H-1Bs to work in the U.S. He feels this will help companies avoid
recession by increasing "income equality", which is of course just a
Greenspan
code word for "cutting salaries".
"Significantly opening up immigration to skilled workers solves
two problems," he said. The companies could hire the educated
workers they need. And those workers would compete with
high-income people, driving more income equality, he said.
The following article was published in the Dallas News, but it's
appearing in
newspapers across the USA.
Now what is becoming crystal clear
here is that this destruction of American jobs -- both skilled and
unskilled -- has been systematically orchestrated at the highest levels
of American government and American business. The quotes from
Greenspan are a smoking gun to what is happening above the base of the
"invisible pyramid." In the
archives I explain the
"invisible pyramid" as follows:
There is an invisible pyramid of power that exist within this society
and throughout the world. The media effectively prevents us from
seeing about the lowermost level through techniques of distraction and
obfuscation. The only saving grace has been a free and unregulated
internet.
The Internet -- the "New Library of Alexandria -- has allowed a few
of us to understand what is going on many levels above the base.
But even the smartest of us can catch but a glimpse of what takes place
at the apex -- where the power is most centralized. To see this
symbolized all you have to do is look at a common dollar bill -- a
source of value that has fallen nearly 30% in value over just the last 7
years.
Though many would say what is going on is a conspiracy I would tend
to differ. Conspiracies are normally completely hidden, while much
about the "Invisible Pyramid" can actually be learned through various
and rare articles and other source material. In any case I have
always preferred the term "Social Control Theory" to "Conspiracy Theory"
for this very reason.
Greenspan has basically let the
cat out of the bag. "We're screwing American workers by displacing
them with younger foreign workers. After all, they're just so many
disposable widgets anyway!" Well, there's another person to invite
to the gun range.
And while we're looking beyond the
base of the "invisible pyramid" let's consider the role Universities are
playing in the destroying the jobs of American workers. First we
should reiterate that the cost, any student pays to go to a university,
is just a fraction of the actual cost: the taxpayer actually shoulders
most of the burden. This was explained in Vince Wade's series.
See my article "Time to
Stick it to China, Before They Stick it to US" for more detail.
Next they indirectly screw American workers by investing their
endowments in hedge funds which are maximized by -- you guessed it --
avoiding the employment of American workers.
Fellow programmer, Valerie Chau,
appears to have found another way universities are screwing American
workers when she investigated the question: "Why are our
universities are busy opening up campus in Dubai, India, China
while Americans are getting the shaft?"
The
World Trade Organization has been pushing trade-services iberalization
for several years, of which higher-educational services are a highly
prized component, with an estimated global market of between $40 billion
and $50 billion (not much less than the market for financial
services)
http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/07/for_profit
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2008/02/15/ross
http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/12/07/for_profit
So, when do we finally decide that
we have had enough? When do we finally get serious? When do
we demand that each and every one of these Indian programmers is forced
to train their American counterpart and then get the hell out of our
country?
Well, of course you could
support my candidacy for President in 2008. Or you could begin to
really support the "New Agenda for America." But if those options
seem to daunting you could at least send a message to you Congressional
representatives.
Dear
Congressman:
Either
put a stop to both Legal Immigration and Illegal Immigration immediately
or I'm going to find someone else to vote for next election.
Just
click here for more information
on contacting them by email or by phone.
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without
formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him
the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the
foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943
Since 9/11, and seemingly without the
notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the
authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents
(citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or
constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency influx of
immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new
programs."
Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of
single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root
(KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the
United States. The government has also contracted with several companies
to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles,
ostensibly to transport detainees.
According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is
part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal
the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."
Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained
about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go
to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of
"new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention
facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house
perhaps millions of people?
Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use
of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive
the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a
century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response
to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any
other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence
has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public
order."
The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just
before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite
imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a
list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the
government's policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and
noncitizens alike.
Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security
Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of
government" in the event of what the document vaguely calls a
"catastrophic emergency." Should the president determine that such an
emergency has occurred, he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he
deems necessary to ensure "continuity of government." This could include
everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution to
launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on
NSPD-51.
U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a
new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955),
which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a
commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of
so-called violent radicalism and extremist ideology, then make
legislative recommendations on combatting it.
According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her
colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a
native brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping
investigative power to combat it.
A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal
Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in
sit-ins, civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of
animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be
anti-abortion protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists,
environmentalists, peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights
supporters ... the list goes on and on. According to author Naomi Wolf,
the National Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000
"terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.
What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make
contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own
citizens?
The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power
under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use
the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.
Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan
Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.
This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle
How's immigration working out for you fellow Americans? Got a goober in
your back pocket? Like what you see in Mexi-fornia? How about Mexi-zona?
What can you say about Mexi-Texas? How about that 1965 Immigration
Reform Act that added 100 million people in four decades? How about the
next 100 million immigrants added by 2040?
Ya' just gotta' love the results don't ya'? What would Andy of Mayberry
say?
"Hey, Andy," Goober said, while twirling his hat.
"Ya' Goob," Andy Taylor muttered.
"What do you git when you has over 100 anglers down on the lake for the
Fishin' Derby that can only handle 20 fishermen Andy?" Goober said.
"Jist a bit over-crowded," Andy said, scowling. "Reckon only a few will
catch a fish and have a harder time fightin' all the others bumping into
them."
"Don't make no sense does it?" Goober said.
"No sense atall," Andy said.
Senator John McCain shot to the top for the Republicans on Super
Tuesday. What could possibly be running through the minds of voters who
voted for him?
McCain along with Teddy Kennedy signed the amnesty package for 4.3
million illegal aliens in 1986. They promised to secure the borders 22
years ago. Today, in the last 22 years, they watched 20 million more
illegals breach our borders. In June of last year, both senators voted
to double legal immigration. Both voted for another amnesty. Both voted
for the Dream Act. Both worked to dissolve America's borders into the
North American Union. Both men voted to get 4,000 of our kids killed in
Iraq-and more to die.
Both men show their ages at 72 and 75 to be out of touch, running out of
life and both remaining out of reach with reality.
Yet, Arizona republicans in droves voted to thrust a broken down old war
horse into the presidency! With his open borders record and complete
chaos in Arizona, why in the name of common sense, would Arizona voters
vote for McCain? He failed them, he failed our Constitution and he
failed in leadership.
This election will prove the most devastating in our nation's history if
pro-open borders candidates Hillary and/or Obama reach the White House
or an old man named John McCain takes the presidency. It's astounding to
me that an old man won't or can't let go the reigns of power. I remember
Reagan fell asleep in cabinet meetings. He proved a figure-head only in
his last four years. With McCain or Hillary/Obama, either way, Americans
from every walk of life face a mind-boggling immigration human armada
out of the third world that will deluge our ability to sustain this
civilization.
My friend George Sura in Fort Collins said it best, "Immigration is the
most formidable weapon of mass destruction threatening America today.
Ironically, invaders have put our country at risk without firing a shot.
The White House, the heavies in Congress and the smaller fish in state
legislatures do not seem to have the collective intellectual depth or
common sense to see what is upon us and how rampant immigration will
degrade the lives and opportunities of our progeny. Every day brings
America closer to irreversible chaos. Behind this issue are blind forces
to reckon with. No politician, political party, corporation, religious
fervor, investment, pop morality or individual aspiration should come
before country. Ever! The brokers who recklessly advocate or condone
pervasive, unending and limitless immigration are steersman with
Titanic-like wheelhouse credentials. They should be kicked out of the
wheelhouse of this nation."
I'm beside myself fellow Americans. Are we that dumb? Are we that duped
by the media to vote McCain into the presidency? Aren't his past actions
enough information to vote for anyone else but McCain?
Do we realize that McCain/Hillary/Obama maintain the same agenda:
dissolve America's borders, dismantle our sovereignty, flood this
country with immigrants, and ultimately, thrust us into a North American
Union?!
Do we realize that McCain hasn't done anything noteworthy or visionary
in 25 years in the Senate? He watched us fall, in fact, voted us into
financial purgatory. He voted for insourcing, outsourcing and offshoring
to take 3.1 million manufacturing jobs out of the USA. He said and did
nothing as he watched his state of Arizona suffer 500,000 illegal
aliens. He watched 20 million illegals breach our borders without a word
of protest. He voted for and will continue our war in Iraq. He did
nothing to work toward energy conservation in 25 years.
John McCain proves to be a spectator on the national stage. How do we
think that would change if he reached the White House? It wouldn't.
If Republicans choose John McCain to represent them on November 4th, it
shows they choose old, out of touch, the past, inactivity and lethargy
over vitality, exuberance, liveliness and creative process. The results
of that kind of leader will prove a continuation of path paved by George
W. Bush.
It will show that voters remain myopic, inflexible, constricted, short
term thinkers and inexorably brain dead.
"Makes no sense atall Goober," Andy said.
Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents from the Arctic
to the South Pole as well as six times across the USA, coast to coast
and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle,
Norway to Athens, Greece. He presents "The Coming Population Crisis in
America: and what you can do about it" to civic clubs, church groups,
high schools and colleges. He works to bring about sensible world
population balance at his website <http://www.frostywooldridge.com/>www.frostywooldridge.com
Related Website: TaxDay08 Publish Date: 2008-02-27
The Full Story:
It’s being called “The Great American Strike” and on April the 15th 2008
more American workers will be on strike than on any other day in our
nation’s history. They won’t be striking for higher pay or better
working conditions or anything you normally associate with a strike.
They will be striking to abolish the Federal Reserve and its partner in
crime, the IRS.
The days of a totally ignorant public are gone and millions of Americans
are aware of the corruption that is the Federal Reserve banking system.
The Fed counterfeits money out of thin air and then “loans” it at face
value to the US government and charges interests on top of that. It’s
the single greatest criminal enterprise ever invented, but some say its
days are numbered.
Thomas Jefferson railed against it, as did Andrew Jackson, Thomas
Edison, Henry Ford, Barry Goldwater, John F. Kennedy and lately
presidential candidate Ron Paul. There are thousands of videos on
YouTube and Google and MySpace and people are downright angry when they
find out they have been duped. Millions of Americans have stopped filing
tax returns all together and millions have been watching public tax
cases like Ed Brown, Wesley Snipes and others going back to Willie
Nelson and James Brown and Will Smith. The end of the Fed is near, and
it should be, it is a criminal act against the free people of the United
States of America.
Of the many quotes that I’ve read while researching “the Great American
Strike”, one stands out. … “You and I weren’t born in a free country;
let’s make sure our children are”. Everyone born since 1913 has been
under a system of incremental slavery, which requires you to pay a
portion of your labor to someone who hasn’t done anything. And you
thought slavery had been outlawed.
Who are these shadowy characters behind this crime and where does your
money go? Those questions can’t be answered in this short space, but
they use the IRS as a way to instill fear and enforce (at gunpoint if
necessary) the delivery of their ill gotten gains. Some point to the
Federal Reserve as the root cause of most of the political corruption in
the US, as well as political scandals and assassinations, such as the
assassination of John F. Kennedy. Kennedy was shot in Dallas not long
after he had signed Executive Orders EO-11 and EO-110, which took the
privilege of printing money away from the Federal Reserve. Can the
Federal Reserve be connected to murder as well as theft?
On April 15th, 2008 the people who know the truth will be on strike,
they will be protesting at the Fed in New York and Boston and San
Francisco, they will be protesting at State Capitols and at local post
offices, handing out information and waving signs to make sure the rest
of you are made aware, that as long as the Fed exists….we aren’t really
free.
Why are Republicans in Congress trying to help Barack Obama (D-IL)?
Republicans allowed a bill that carries his name to pass the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee by voice vote last week (without any
hearings), which means there was no roll-call vote so we can hold any
Member accountable. It passed the House by voice vote last year.
The Obama bill passed out of Committee with the cooperation of the
ranking Republican, Senator Richard Lugar (IN). A Rhodes scholar like
Bill Clinton, Lugar never saw a UN enhancement he didn't like.
Obama's costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill, which could come up
in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act (S. 2433). It
would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic
Product on foreign handouts, which is at least $30 billion over and
above the exorbitant and wasted sums we already give away overseas.
Obama's bill would require the President "to develop and implement a
comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy
objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination
of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium
Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people
worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."
We should be on guard any time politicians use the word "comprehensive,"
an umbrella word that always shades a lot of mischief. The notion that
U.S. taxpayers should or could cut in half the number of people
worldwide who live in poverty by 2015 is ridiculous.
The scariest phrase in Obama's bill is Millennium Development Goal. That
refers to the Declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium
Assembly and Summit in 2000 (blessed by President Bill Clinton) which
called for the "eradication of poverty" by "redistribution [of] wealth
and land," cancellation of "the debts of developing countries," and "a
fair distribution of the earth's resources" (from the United States to
the rest of the world, of course).
The Millennium project is monitored by Jeffrey D. Sachs, a Columbia
University economist. In 2005 he presented then UN Secretary General
Kofi Annan with a 3,000-page report based on the research of 265
so-called poverty specialists.
Sachs' document criticized the United States for giving only $16.3
billion a year in global anti-poverty aid. He argued that we should
spend an additional $30 billion a year in order to reach the 0.7 percent
target that the UN set for us in 2000.
Sachs says that the only way to force the United States to commit that
much money is by a global tax, such as a tax on fossil fuels. Empowering
the United Nations to impose a direct international tax on Americans has
been a UN goal ever since the 1995 Copenhagen Summit embraced the
so-called Tobin Tax.
By adopting the Millennium Goals in 2000, the UN escalated its demands
for the UN to impose international taxes. Specifically, the Millennium
called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land
and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection
— oil, natural gas, coal," "fees for the commercial use of the oceans,
fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic
spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon
content of fuels."
It doesn't bother UN sycophants that most of our foreign handouts go
into the hands of corrupt dictators who hate us and vote against us in
the UN, and that only 30 percent of our foreign-aid money ever reaches
the poor. UN bureaucrats accuse the United States of being "stingy" in
our handouts to underdeveloped countries.
There is much more to the Millennium Goals than merely extorting more
money from U.S. taxpayers. The Goals set forth a comprehensive plan to
put the United States under UN global governance.
These Goals include a "standing Peace Force" (i.e., a UN standing army),
a "UN Arms register" of all small arms and light weapons, "peace
education" covering "all levels from pre-school through university," and
"political control of the global economy." The Goals call for
implementing all the UN treaties that the United States has never
ratified, all of which set up UN monitoring committees to invade our
sovereignty.
To achieve this level of control over U.S. domestic law, the plan calls
for "strengthening the United Nations for the 21st Century" by
"eliminating" the veto and permanent membership in the Security Council.
The goal is to reduce U.S. influence to 1 out of 192 nations, so we
would have merely the same vote as Cuba.
Obama's Global Poverty Act would be a giant step toward the Millennium
Goals of global governance and international taxes on Americans. Tell
your Senators to kill this un-American bill.
Further Reading:
Will McCain Oppose $845 Billion Earmark?, by Cliff Kincaid, February 20,
2008
Obama's Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote, by Cliff Kincaid,
February 12, 2008
Washington, District of Columbia -
At long last, the Democrats are talking about the economy and the need
for serious relief and reforms. The reason is simple. The people are
feeling the squeeze.
Reports the Baltimore Sun:
"Since January alone, the public's perception about the state of the
economy has plummeted - with just 17 percent calling the nation's
economy excellent or good - down from 26 percent last month. The
percentage rating the economy poor has grown from 28 to 45 percent."
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama now have their instant ten point plans
and programs. They have dipped into John Edwards' tool chest for ideas
on fighting poverty and listened to policy advisors who have come up
with a laundry list of proposals for stop gap measures from hikes in the
minimum wage and middle class tax cuts. All of these proposals will take
time to implement and probably will be forgotten by the time one of them
becomes President, if they do.
Meanwhile, the economy is collapsing because of crimes and
irresponsibility on Wall Street and no one is really talking about that.
An inequality gap and structural crisis compounded by profiteering in
high places goes on and is largely ignored.
The media is not investigating the profiteers and continues to
contribute to the problem by accepting millions for dubious ads for more
loans that end up getting more Americans in debt. Prosecutors are not
prosecuting wrong doing. No fundamental new regulations and oversight
are being proposed.
The candidates don't even seem to know the extent of damage that is
being done by the subprime crisis, and its assignees. Andrew Abraham
reports:
"Bank of America delivered a report last night highlighting the current
losses of the 'Credit Crisis'. According to the report the meltdown in
the US sub-prime real estate market has led to a global loss of $7.7
trillion dollars in stock market value since October.
Quoting Bank of America chief market strategist Joseph Quinlan "The
crisis, which has spread beyond US shores to banks and other sectors
worldwide, is 'one of the most vicious in financial history.'"
That number again $7.7 TRILLION. That phrase again: "the most vicious,"
that is, worse than 1929 and all the financial crises since.
Who is responsible for this and who is being made responsible? Why
aren't we talking about these massive losses and the growing debt
burden? Why is this issue not on the political agenda, save for the
efforts of a few advocacy groups on the left and Ron Paul on the right?
It was discouraging when our government's leading critic of these
practices got so discouraged that he quit last week. David Walker, the
Comptroller of the Currency had warned back in 2005 (as reported in my
film In Debt We Trust):
"Continuing on this unsustainable path will gradually erode If not
suddenly damage our economy, our standard of living and ultimately our
national security."
And guess what? Just two years later, our economy was "suddenly
damaged." The damage is "affecting our standard of living," and very few
public officials or political candidates are connecting the dots. Why
not?
When will we condemn the false prophets of the free market and their
misguided policies? When will we indict those who cashed in on our
country's misery?
Notes scholar Lionel Tiger:
"Those who have been operating the managerial levers of the financial
system have failed embarrassingly and massively to comprehend the
processes for which they are responsible. They have loaned money avidly
and recklessly to people who couldn't pay it back. They fudged data to
get loans approved and recalculated. Then they sausaged fragile figments
of moneyreality into new 'products' which could be sold around the world
to investors eager to enjoy the surprising returns which often accompany
theft, managerial incompetence, and fraud.
When it comes to responsibility for all this, there appears to be no one
here but us spring chickens. Not only that but the overseers of the
bitter debacle may lose their jobs for a month but nonetheless fill
their wheelbarrows with company money and 'severance' when they leave to
tide them over until the next corner office becomes available."
And what is to be done about this white-collar crime wave? At long last
even shamed executives in the financial industry are joining those of us
who long ago charged that subprime is really subcrime. Basil Williams,
chief executive officer of Concordia Advisors, a hedge fund, says we
need "a safety net for the innocent and a dragnet for the guilty."
Writing in the Record in Bergen County, N.J. he says that the greedy
should pay to help the needy:
"The costs can be recouped by going after those who profited handsomely
and unfairly from the multitude of transactions that touched the
industry, including:
• Mortgage brokers who originated loans to those who didn't understand
the conditions, couldn't afford them and should not have qualified.
• Appraisers who overvalued homes, knowing that the higher the value
they gave a property, the more business they would reap from a dishonest
broker.
• Banks and brokerage firms that purchased, packaged and resold the
mortgages for huge fees."
He goes on to discuss ratings agencies and more. This is a litany that
the candidates and activists should sign on to.
With millions facing foreclosure, we have to expose those responsible
and mount a movement for economic justice. It can be done. It should be
done. Who is ready to stand up and organize a national mobilization to
stop this outrage? Who is ready to fund it?
Who?
- News Dissector Danny Schechter directed "In Debt We Trust" (indebtwetrust.com)
and wrote SQUEEZED about the crisis (Coldtype.net)
Comment: Original link (above) contains a number of incriminating videos
concerning Osama Obama and his true support for NAFTA . . . and perhaps
the NAU as well.
Hope, change, or is it false hope? This is must see TV, straight from
CTV, a major Canadian network, who checks their sources and it’s
damning. They catch Obama in a bold faced lie on NAFTA.
From CTV:
Within the last month, a top staff member for Obama’s campaign
telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, and
warned him that Obama would speak out against NAFTA, according to
Canadian sources.
The staff member reassured Wilson that the criticisms would only be
campaign rhetoric, and should not be taken at face value
There are two must see video reports. The first is the original story,
the second is the Clinton campaign not only denying they did anything
similar but encouraging CTV to investigate and out anyone even remotely
affiliated with them who could be found to make such promises to not
renegotiate NAFTA.
So far, it sure appears that CTV is dead on, which leads to another
question, why is it that Canadian broadcast television can break this so
important story while US TV goes on and on about identity politics.
Maybe when they renegotiate NAFTA we can import some real journalism to
boot.
Additional MSN video of outrage over Obama not speaking up to save
Maytag jobs:
Update: Canadian Embassy denies such a conversation took place, but read
the fine print here, for they are validating that among staff, multiple
conversations took place, both campaigns. Canadian Embassy:
We’ve impressed upon them the fact that NAFTA has been good for all
three countries,” Norton said. “They have made it clear that NAFTA is an
issue of contention in the [U.S.], and that inevitably there would be
discussion and debate surrounding NAFTA.”
“They’ve heard us out on the issue of NAFTA and expressed understanding
for our position. But the candidates and their campaigns have been very
careful to refrain from making specific commitments,” Norton continued,
reiterating that no such conversation like the one described in the
Canadian TV report ever happened
I for one have a hard time believing a major news organization is going
to make up such a bombshell story out of thin air. We shall see.
Anything purchased,
through the links in this column, generate revenue for New Age Citizen
and will help us achieve the policy goals discussed at this website.
In addition to the book links is the "New Age Emporium" link below.
This will take you to our comprehensive digital storefront where you can
purchase anything from books, to DVD's, to computers. This allows
you to purchase things you actually need, while helping New Age Citizen
achieve needed social change. We appreciate your support.
